докторські

Permanent URI for this collectionhttp://194.247.13.39:4000/handle/8989898989/58

Browse

Browsing докторські by Author "Романцова, Н. І."

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
  • Thumbnail Image
    Item
    Наукова діяльність Михайла Грушевського в українській історіографії
    (2021) Романцова, Н. І.; Romantsova, N.
    У дисертації в контексті соціогуманітаристики здійснено комплексний історіографічний аналіз творчої, науково-організаційної, видавничої, педагогічної, публіцистичної діяльності М. Грушевського – видатного репрезентанта української національної історичної науки та державного діяча кінця ХІХ – першої третини ХХ ст. у різні періоди його життя. Проаналізовано стан наукової розробки проблеми. З’ясовано, що історіографічні рефлексії наукової діяльності М. Грушевського в українській історіографії простежується з кінця ХІХ ст. до нашого часу. Сформовано репрезентативну джерельну базу дослідження. Сформульовано методологічні засади написання дисертації та з’ясовано, що для теоретичного осягнення об’єкта і предмета роботи найбільш придатним видається поєднання елементів постмодернізму, зокрема парадигм інтелектуальної історії, соціокультурної історії, історії генерацій, квантитативних методів історичних студій. Здійснено темпоральне квантитативне дослідження великого масиву публікацій, присвячених науковій діяльності М. Грушевського. The dissertation presents comprehensive historiographical analysis of creative, archaeographical, science-facilitating, publishing, pedagogical and journalistic activities carried out by Mykhailo Hrushevskyi, a prominent representative of Ukrainian science and statesman of the late 19th-the early 20th century in various periods of his life. It is proved that historiographical research practices applied by Hrushevskyi experts to the scientist’s scientific activities are an important trend of Ukrainian humanitaristics. They embrace the Caucasian period in the formation of his intellectual biography and the years of his learning at the history and philology department of Kyiv St. Volodymyr University when his scientific views were being formed as well as Lviv and Lviv/Kyiv periods of the late 19th-the early 20th century which were distinguished by his work at Lviv University, scientific development of Ukraine’s national history, creation of Lviv Historical School, organizational and publishing activities at T. Shevchenko Scientific Society and at the Ukrainian Scientific Society, which was combined with active journalistic activity. Attention is paid to the fact that Hrushevskyi experts also pay attention to the Russian exile at the time of World War I as well as to the combination of Mykhailo Hrushevskyi’s scientific, political and publicist activities in the stormy years of the Ukrainian Revolution at the time of the fight for renovation of Ukraine’s nationhood, tohis work at Ukrainian Sociological Institute at the time of his emigration and at All-Ukrainian Academy of Sciences in the last years of his life when the scientist exerted efforts for the sake of scientific, organizational and publishing work, overcoming the counteraction exercised by the Bolshevik power and academic bureaucracy. It is emphasized that Ukrainian scientists analyze Mykhailo Hrushevskyi’s role in founding Scientific Research Chair of History of Ukraine at All-Ukrainian Academy of Sciences from different methodological positions. Hrushevskyi experts emphasize the scientist’s publishing work in “The Notes of T. Shevchenko Scientific Society”, “Literary and Scientific Reporter”, the Journal “Ukraine” of various periods and his participation in the activities carried out by Kiev Historical School. The author has defined the Ukrainian scientists’ reflection in terms of various aspects of Hrushevskyi’s multifaceted scientific legacy, which has revealed his titanic working capacity and the scientist’s influence on all the spheres of Ukrainian scientific life. It is defined that in his multiple works, he formulated and was developing the brand new concept of Ukrainian national history as well as the national narrative. He was one of the first ones in Ukrainian historiography to develop the generalizing overview of the world literature and history of Ukrainian literature, combing history and sociology. The extent of the problem’s scientific exploration is analyzed. It is stated that the historical reflections of Mykhailo Hrushevsky’s scientific activities in Ukrainian historiography are traced since the late 20th century until nowadays in studios led by the scientist’s contemporaries and reviewers, such as D. Bahalii, M. Vasylenko, V. Herasymchuk, D. Doroshenko, S. Yefremov, M. Korduba, I. Krypiakevych, S. Tomashevsky and I. Franko, in works by Soviet scientists, such as O. Kasymenko, M. Petrovsky, M. Rubach, V. Sarbei and F. Yastrebov, in works by historians of the Ukrainian diaspora, such as L. Vynar, I. Vytanovych, O. Dombrovsky, V. Doroshenko, D. Doroshenko, A. Zhukovsky, I. Lysiak-Rudnytsky, O. Ohloblyn and O. Prytsak, in works by modern Ukrainian scientists, such as H. Burlaka, V. Vaschenko, I. Verba, O. Vladyha, I. Hyrych, V. Hotsuliak, Ya. Hrytsak, Ya. Dashkevych, V. Zaruba, L. Zashkilniak, Ya. Kalakura, O. Kopylenko, M. Kucherenko, Ye. Luniak, Ya. Malyk, V. Masnenko, S. Pankova, V. Pedych, R. Pyrih, S. Plohii, G. Srelsky, V.V. Telvak, V.P. Telvak, V. Khomenko, O. Yurkova, Yu. Shapoval, F. Shevchenko, O. Yas and others. The representative source basis of the research is formed, such as Ukrainian scientists’ historiographical studios from the late 19th century till nowadays, peer reviews presenting the reflection of Mykhailo Hrushevsky’s texts, synthetic biographical texts compiled by Hrushevsky experts, paperwork, media reports, sources of special origin, documents from the National Archives of Ukraine and from the Manuscript Institute of the National V. Vernadskyi Library of Ukraine as well as from an archival institutional of the Russian Federation. The modern methodological basis for writing the dissertation is formulated and it is determined that in order to theoretically understand the object and the subject of the research, it is the combination of elements of post-modernism, in particular combination of the paradigms of intellectual history, socio-cultural history, history of generations and quantitative methods in analyzing historical studios that appears to be the most suitable one. The defined methodological approaches presuppose analysis of various aspects of thescientist’s legacy through his intellectual biography and socio-cultural environment, which makes it possible to present a comprehensive overview of Ukrainian historiography of his scientific activities. Temporal quantitative research of a great number of publications concerned with M. Hrushevsky’s scientific activities is carried out. Using the quantitative methods, the general dynamics of historiographical studios concerned with M. Hrushevsky’s scientific activities as well as the peculiarities of various periods in development of Hrushevsky studies and the trends thereof are defined. It is proved that since the late 19th until the early 21st century Ukrainian historiography has preserved the steady scientific interest in the highlight of multifaceted activities carried out by M. Hrushevsky as a scientist as well as a representative of Ukrainian national historiography and science facilitator who implemented the innovative approaches of European scientists of his time in the Ukrainian intellectual field.